Regulation effect of lipopolysaccharide on the alternative splicing and function of sweet taste receptor T1R2 / 华西口腔医学杂志

OBJECTIVES@#To identify the alternative splicing isoform of mouse sweet taste receptor T1R2, and investigate the effect of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) local injection on T1R2 alternative splicing and the function of sweet taste receptor as one of the bacterial virulence factors.@*METHODS@#After mouse taste bud tissue isolation was conducted, RNA extraction and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were performed to identify the splicing isoform of T1R2. Heterologous expression experiments @*RESULTS@#T1R2 splicing isoform T1R2_Δe3p formed sweet taste receptors with T1R3, which could not be activated by sweet taste stimuli and significantly downregulated the function of canonical T1R2/T1R3. Local LPS injection significantly increased the expression ratio of T1R2_Δe3p in mouse taste buds.@*CONCLUSIONS@#LPS stimulation affects the alternative splicing of mouse sweet taste receptor T1R2 and significantly upregulates the expression of non-functional isoform T1R2_Δe3p, suggesting that T1R2 alternative splicing regulation may be one of the mechanisms by which microbial infection affects host taste perception.

Presence of carbohydrate binding modules in extracellular region of class C G-protein coupled receptors (C GPCR): An in silico investigation on sweet taste receptor

Sweet taste receptor (STR) is a C GPCR family member and a suggested drug target for metabolic disorders such asdiabetes. Detailed characteristics of the molecule as well as its ligand interactions mode are yet considerably unclear due toexperimental study limitations of transmembrane proteins. An in silico study was designed to find the putative carbohydratebinding sites on STR. To this end, a-D-glucose and its a-1,4-oligomers (degree of polymerization up to 14) were chosen asprobes and docked into an ensemble of different conformations of the extracellular region of STR monomers (T1R2 andT1R3), using AutoDock Vina. Ensembles had been sampled from an MD simulation experiment. Best poses were furtherenergy-minimized in the presence of water molecules with Amber14 forcefield. For each monomer, four distinct bindingregions consisting of one or two binding pockets could be distinguished. These regions were further investigated withregard to hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity of the residues, as well as residue compositions and non-covalent interactionswith ligands. Popular binding regions showed similar characteristics to carbohydrate binding modules (CBM). Observationof several conserved or semi-conserved residues in these binding regions suggests a possibility to extrapolate the results toother C GPCR family members. In conclusion, presence of CBM in STR and, by extrapolation, in other C GPCR familymembers is suggested, similar to previously proposed sites in gut fungal C GPCRs, through transcriptome analyses. STRmodes of interaction with carbohydrates are also discussed and characteristics of non-covalent interactions in C GPCRfamily are highlighted.

Effect of Astragalus Polysaccharide on Sweet Taste Receptor Pathway in Intestine of Rat Model Induced by High-sugar and High-fat Diet / 中国实验方剂学杂志

Objective:To observe the effect of astragalus polysaccharide (APS) on taste receptor 1 member 2 (T1R2)/taste receptor 1 member 3 (T1R3) sweet taste receptor pathway in intestine of rat model induced by high-sugar and high-fat diet. Method:SD rats were randomly divided into normal group, high-sugar and high-fat group and astragalus polysaccharide group. Rats in high-sugar and high-fat group and astragalus polysaccharide groups were fed with high-sugar and high-fat diet for 16 weeks, while rats in astragalus polysaccharide group were fed with APS (0.7 g·kg-1, per day) for 8 weeks during this period. Serum samples were collected to determine the levels of fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Intestinum tenue was collected to determine mRNA expressions of T1R2/T1R3, α-gustducin (Gα gust), transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily member 5 (TRPM5) and proglucagon (PG) gene by Real-time PCR, and protein expressions of T1R2, Gα gust and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) protein by Western blot. Result:Rats in high-sugar and high-fat group had significantly higher levels of TC, TG and LDL-C, and lower HDL-C level in serum than those in normal group (Pα gust and PG genes in intestine, were significantly down-regulated in high-sugar and high-fat group (PPα gust, TRPM5 and PG genes in intestine were significantly up-regulated in astragalus polysaccharide group (Pα gust and GLP-1 protein expressions was consistent with that of T1R2, Gα gust and GLP-1 mRNA expressions. Protein expressions of T1R2, Gα gust and GLP-1 and mRNA expression of T1R3 were significantly lower in astragalus polysaccharide group than those of control group (PConclusion:APS could improve disturbance of lipid metabolism and impairment of intestinal sweet taste receptor pathway for rat model induced by high-sugar and high-fat diet.

Seleção de aptâmeros que se ligam ao receptor humano para o gosto doce / Screening for aptamers that bind to the human sweet taste receptor (hT1R2/hT1R3)

Foi demonstrado que o gosto doce é transduzido por receptores acoplados a proteína G classe III (GPCRs), T1R2 e T1R3. Essas proteínas exibem longas extremidades amino-terminais que formam um domínio de ligação globular extracelular. Elas são expressas em células associadas ao gosto (células epiteliais que constituem os botões gustativos nas papilas gustativas), que respondem a moléculas associadas ao gosto doce. Quando T1R2 e T1R3 são co-expressas em células heterólogas, elas respondem, como heterômeros, a uma série de açúcares, alguns D-aminoácidos, edulcorantes artificiais e proteínas doces. Foi também demonstrado que o receptor humano T1R2/T1R3 para o gosto doce apresenta múltiplos sítios de ligação. Para melhor compreender a estrutura desse receptor e responder à pergunta de como um único quimiorreceptor pode ser responsivo a uma variedade de ligantes, foi utilizada a abordagem denominada evolução sistemática de ligantes por enriquecimento exponencial (SELEX) para isolar, a partir de uma biblioteca combinatória de oligonucleotídeos, aptâmeros de RNA resistentes a nuclease que se ligam ao receptor humano para o gosto doce com alta afinidade. Após um enriquecimento de doze ciclos do pool original de RNA contendo em torno de 1013 sequências diferentes (contra preparações de membrana de células HEK293T que expressam hT1R2/hT1R3) e outros ciclos de contrasseleção negativa (para eliminar moléculas de RNA que se ligam de forma inespecífica à membrana de nitrocelulose e a outras proteínas diferentes do alvo, ou seja, proteínas de membrana de células HEK293T selvagem), realizou-se a transcrição reversa do RNA seguida de amplificação por PCR e sequenciamento. Aptâmeros do ciclo 12 com sequências consenso foram selecionados, e a ligação de alguns deles com hT1R2/hT1R3 foi então avaliada. Cinco desses aptâmeros mostram claramente uma maior afinidade por células HEK293T que expressam hT1R2/hT1R3. Como segunda parte desta tese, estudamos outro receptor, denominado CD36, que, como o receptor T1R2/T1R3, é expresso na língua. Estudos indicam que ele age como receptor gustativo de gordura. Neste trabalho, verificamos que essa proteína é expressa em uma subpopulação de neurônios olfatórios presentes no epitélio olfatório, indicando que ela pode ter também uma função olfatória, ainda não caracterizada

It has been shown that sweet taste is transduced by the Class III G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) T1R2 and T1R3, which show long N-termini that form a globular extracellular ligand-binding domain. These receptors are expressed in the taste cells (epithelial cells that constitute the taste buds in taste papillae) that respond to sweet tastants, and when T1R2 and T1R3 are coexpressed in heterologous cells, they respond, as heteromers, to a series of sugars, some D-amino acids, artificial sweeteners and sweet proteins. It has also been demonstrated that the sweet taste receptor has multiple binding sites. In order to better understand the structure of this receptor and answer the question of how a single chemoreceptor can respond to a variety of ligands, we used the combinatorial oligonucleotide library screening approach, denominated Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment (SELEX), to isolate nuclease-resistant RNA aptamers that bind to the human sweet taste receptor with high affinity. Following a twelve round enrichment of the previous random RNA pool containing around 1013 different sequences (against membrane preparations of hT1R2/hT1R3-expressing HEK293T cells) and negative counterselection cycles (to eliminate RNA molecules that bind nonspecifically to the nitrocellulose membrane and to proteins other than the target, that is, HEK293T cells membrane proteins), the RNA was reverse-transcribed for DNA sequencing. Aptamers from cycle 12 with consensus sequences were selected, and the binding of some of them to the human sweet taste receptor was then evaluated. Five out of the aptamers clearly show greater affinity for hT1R2/hT1R3-expressing HEK293T cells than for hT1R2/hT1R3-non-expressing HEK293T cells. In this thesis we have also analyzed another receptor, denominated CD36, which is also expressed in the tongue. Studies indicate that it acts as a receptor for fat. In this work, we found that CD36 is expressed in a subset of the olfactory neurons localized in the olfactory epithelium, indicating that it may also have an as yet uncharacterized olfactory function

Sweet Taste-Sensing Receptors Expressed in Pancreatic beta-Cells: Sweet Molecules Act as Biased Agonists

The sweet taste receptors present in the taste buds are heterodimers comprised of T1R2 and T1R3. This receptor is also expressed in pancreatic beta-cells. When the expression of receptor subunits is determined in beta-cells by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, the mRNA expression level of T1R2 is extremely low compared to that of T1R3. In fact, the expression of T1R2 is undetectable at the protein level. Furthermore, knockdown of T1R2 does not affect the effect of sweet molecules, whereas knockdown of T1R3 markedly attenuates the effect of sweet molecules. Consequently, a homodimer of T1R3 functions as a receptor sensing sweet molecules in beta-cells, which we designate as sweet taste-sensing receptors (STSRs). Various sweet molecules activate STSR in beta-cells and augment insulin secretion. With regard to intracellular signals, sweet molecules act on STSRs and increase cytoplasmic Ca2+ and/or cyclic AMP (cAMP). Specifically, when an STSR is stimulated by one of four different sweet molecules (sucralose, acesulfame potassium, sodium saccharin, or glycyrrhizin), distinct signaling pathways are activated. Patterns of changes in cytoplasmic Ca2+ and/or cAMP induced by these sweet molecules are all different from each other. Hence, sweet molecules activate STSRs by acting as biased agonists.

The Role of the Sweet Taste Receptor in Enteroendocrine Cells and Pancreatic beta-Cells

The sweet taste receptor is expressed in taste cells located in taste buds of the tongue. This receptor senses sweet substances in the oral cavity, activates taste cells, and transmits the taste signals to adjacent neurons. The sweet taste receptor is a heterodimer of two G protein-coupled receptors, T1R2 and T1R3. Recent studies have shown that this receptor is also expressed in the extragustatory system, including the gastrointestinal tract, pancreatic beta-cells, and glucose-responsive neurons in the brain. In the intestine, the sweet taste receptor regulates secretion of incretin hormones and glucose uptake from the lumen. In beta-cells, activation of the sweet taste receptor leads to stimulation of insulin secretion. Collectively, the sweet taste receptor plays an important role in recognition and metabolism of energy sources in the body.